Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2017 Sep 4;105:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.024

Table 3.

Regression analysis predicting beliefs about e-cigarette harms and benefits by e-cigarette use status, 2016

Never users (n=1326) Tried but not in the past 30 days (n=422) Used at least once in the past 30 days (n=308)

Beliefs about harms B 95% CI p B 95% CI p B 95% CI p
Experimental Condition
 Positive (referent)
 Negative 0.219* [0.033,0.405] 0.021 0.028 [−0.288,0.343] 0.863 0.264 [−0.156,0.685] 0.217
 Conflicting 0.048 [−0.138,0.233] 0.613 0.023 [−0.303,0.350] 0.889 0.145 [−0.264,0.553] 0.486
 Control 0.166* [0.007,0.325] 0.041 0.042 [−0.233,0.317] 0.766 0.141 [−0.232,0.514] 0.458

Beliefs about benefits B 95% CI p B 95% CI p B 95% CI p
Experimental Condition
 Positive (referent)
 Negative −0.324** [−0.523, −0.125] 0.001 0.008 [−0.306,0.322] 0.958 −0.268 [−0.619,0.084] 0.135
 Conflicting −0.221* [−0.422, −0.021] 0.03 −0.031 [−0.354,0.291] 0.849 −0.165 [−0.508,0.178] 0.345
 Control −0.210* [−0.382, −0.038] 0.017 −0.083 [−0.354,0.189] 0.549 −0.265 [−0.579,0.048] 0.097

Notes. Above models controlled for ethnicity.

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01.