Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 23;7:13806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13670-z

Table 2.

Details of the Studies Included in the Systematic Review. (T = length of time monitored; OS_C = raw overall survival rate; OS_A = adjusted overall survival rate; DFS_C = raw disease-free survival rate; DFS_A = adjusted disease-free survival rate; RFS_C = raw recurrence-free survival rate; RFS_A = adjusted recurrence-free survival rate).

AUTHOR YEAR Technique Cutoff over-expression N T(YEARS) OS_C 95% CI OS_A 95% CI DFS_C/RFS_C 95% CI DFS_A/ RFS_A 95% CI
Kurihara_2016 2016 IHC − → < 80% Mean nuclear positivity + → ≥ 80% Mean nuclear positivity 301 4.4 0.48(0.29–0.77)
Benard_2014 2014 IHC − → ≤ median % of nuclear positivity + → > median % of nuclear positivity 247 8.6 0.74(0.54–1.03) 0.84(0.60–1.18) 0.64(0.42–0.99) 0.67(0.43–1.05)
Liu_2014 2014 q-PCR − → ≤ median tumor/normal ratio + → > median tumor/normal ratio 82 3 4.18(2.08–8.36) 2.52(1.10–5.73)
Tamagawa_2013 2013 IHC − → ≤ median value of H-score EZH2 (0–300) + → > median value of H-score EZH2 (0–300) 54 8 1.09(0.50–2.44)
Lin_2013 2013 IHC Index value calculated as a product of the grades of the extent and intensity of staining:− → Grades 0–3 + → Grades 4–12 33 5.8 5.07(1.51–16.7)
Takawa_2011 2011 IHC − → No appreciable staining in tumor cells + → Brown staining appreciable in the nucleus of tumor cells 172 5 0.39(0.19–0.83) 0.42(0.18–0.97)
Kodach_2010 2010 IHC − → < 70% positive tumor cells + → ≥ 70% positive tumor cells 72 6.6 1.54 (0.29–8.38)
Wang_2010 2010 IHC − → ≤ 30% positive tumor cells + → > 30% positive tumor cells 119 6.6 3.21(1.06–9.72)
Fluge_2009 2009 IHC Index value calculated as a product of the grades of the extent and intensity of staining:− → Grades 0–3 + → Grades 4–9 409 7 1.17(0.46–2.98)
Mimori_2005 2005 q-PCR − → ≤ median tumor/normal ratio + → > median tumor/normal ratio 61 8 2.17(0.93–5.07)