Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 19;7:246. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00246

Table 3.

The prognostic significance of the examined GLCM features.a,b

SASM SIDM SCN SCR SE
Coronal section
0.79 0.69 0.04 0.32 0.90
0.53; 0.28–0.79 0.45; 0.20–0.70 0.73; 0.52–0.95 0.38; 0.13–0.62 0.52; 0.27–0.77
Sagittal section
0.39 1.0 0.29 0.58 0.69
0.61; 0.37–0.85 0.50; 0.25–0.75 0.63; 0.39–0.87 0.43; 0.17–0.69 0.45; 0.20–0.70
Transversal section
0.25 0.74 0.95 0.19 0.64
0.65; 0.40–0.89 0.46; 0.21–0.71 0.49; 0.23–0.75 0.67; 0.43–0.90 0.44; 0.19–0.69
Average
0.24 0.69 0.24 0.84 0.64
0.65; 0.41–89 0.45; 0.20–0.70 0.65; 0.42–0.88 0.53; 0.27–0.78 0.44; 0.19–0.69

ROC analysis was used for evaluation of predictive significance. Each result indicates a P-value followed by AUC and its 95% confidence interval.

aAUC values and 95% CI are bootstrap corrected.

bObtained with continuous data.

SASM, angular second moment; SIDM, inverse difference moment; SCN, contrast; SCR, correlation; SE, entropy.

Boldface values indicate significance with p < 0.05.