Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 1;9(1):1–15. doi: 10.1049/iet-syb.2014.0006

Table 2.

Numerical estimation of the magnitude Eε of the FCD‐error, as a function of the parameter ε, and its comparison with the theoretical prediction lower bound Mτ0εNτ0, where the values of Mτ0andNτ0 are given in (24)

ε Eε M
10−2 0.647580 0.517450
10−3 0.648983 0.635971
10−4 0.649124 0.647823
10−5 0.649138 0.649008
10−6 0.649139 0.649126

The parameter p is selected as p = 20