Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 26;49(4):906–914. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.424

Table 3.

Relationships of RET fusion gene arrangement with variables

Variable RET fusion
BRAF mutation
Negative (n=216) Positive (n=24) p-value Negative (n=50) Positive (n=190) p-value
Age (yr)
 < 45 94 (43.5) 16 (66.7) 0.031* 28 (56.0) 82 (43.2) 0.105
 ≥ 45 122 (56.5) 8 (33.3) 22 (44.0) 108 (56.8)
Sex
 Male 57 (26.4) 8 (33.3) 0.468 13 (36.0) 52 (27.4) 0.846
 Female 159 (73.6) 16 (66.7) 37 (74.0) 138 (72.6)
N stage
 N1a 132 (61.1) 7 (29.2) 0.003* 26 (52.0) 113 (59.5) 0.341
 N1b 84 (38.9) 17 (70.8) 24 (48.0) 77 (40.5)
RET
 Fusion (+) - - - 11 (22.0) 13 (6.8) 0.001*
 Fusion (–) - - - 39 (78.0) 177 (93.2)
BRAF
 Mutation (+) 177 (81.9) 13 (54.2) 0.001* - - -
 Mutation (–) 39 (18.1) 11 (45.8) - - -
PIK3CA
 Mutation (+) 152 (70.4) 19 (79.2) 0.366 33 (66.0) 138 (72.6) 0.357
 Mutation (–) 64 (29.6) 5 (20.8) 17 (34.0) 52 (27.4)
NTKR1/3
 Fusion (+) 6 (2.8) 0 > 0.990 2 (4.0) 4 (2.1) 0.607
 Fusion (–) 210 (97.2) 24 (100) 48 (96.0) 186 (97.9)

Values are presented as number (%).

*

p < 0.05.