Table 1.
Domains | Scorea | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Eligibility | 5 | All residents ≥ 15 years of age are eligible for study participation, identical to usual care |
Recruitment | 4 | Recruitment effort (community sensitization, drama shows, and Health Scouts approaching residents) is likely modestly above what would be expected in usual care |
Setting | 4 | The setting is mostly similar in key characteristics (e.g., high-risk population) to other usual-care settings |
Organization | 3 | The care delivery organization is likely much higher resourced than most usual-care organizations but efforts were made to replicate more usual-care resource capacity |
Flexibility (delivery) | 5 | Flexibility is anticipated to be the same in how the intervention is delivered in the trial and flexibility anticipated in usual care |
Flexibility (adherence) | 5 | No special trial measures to promote participant participation with Health Scout intervention |
Follow-up | 3 | Participants being surveyed every at regular intervals in this trial which may be different from other settings |
Primary outcome | 5 | Outcome is very directly relevant to participants |
Primary analyses | 5 | All data will be included in the analysis of the primary outcomes |
aPRECIS 5-point Likert Scale, 1 = very explanatory, 2 = rather explanatory, 3 = equally pragmatic/explanatory, 4 = rather pragmatic, 5 = very pragmatic