Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 10;2017:5898701. doi: 10.1155/2017/5898701

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Correspondence analysis for the categories. This two-dimensional representation explains 42.52% of the total variation with 15.59% explained by 1st dimension, 13.86% by the 2nd dimension, and 13.07% by the 3rd. The value of the third dimension is shown in parenthesis.