Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep;55(3):429–437. doi: 10.17113/ftb.55.03.17.5200

Table 2. Effect of conventional solvent and ionic liquids on the extraction of total proanthocyanidins from grape skin.

Solvent w(total proanthocyanidins)/(mg/g)
CH3OH/H2O (60:40) (99.1±0.8)j
C2H6CO/H2O (80:20)
CH3OH/H2O (60:40)
(218.4±1.2)n
[C2mim][Br]_0.5 M (52.1±2.3)d
[C2mim][Br]_1.5 M (91.9±2.0)j
[C2mim][Br]_2.5 M (129.9±2.3)lm
[C4mim][Br]_0.5 M (60.1±1.3)ef
[C4mim][Br]_1.5 M (129.1±1.4)l
[C4mim][Br]_2.5 M (137.0±0.8)m
[C5mim][Br]_0.5 M (41.3±2.9)c
[C5mim][Br]_1.5 M (95.4±0.8)j
[C5mim][Br]_2.5 M (110.4±4.4)k
[C7mim][Br]_0.5 M (38.6±2.7)c
[C7mim][Br]_1.5 M (76.0±0.3)h
[C10mim][Br]_0.5 M (6.6±0.8)a
[C10mim][Br]_1.5 M (15.7±0.8)b
[mim][HSO4]_0.5 M (56.7±1.4)de
[mim][HSO4]_1.5 M (66.6±0.7)fg
[mim][HSO4]_2.5 M (84.6±0.9)i
[sC4mim][HSO4]_0.5 M (55.0±0.7)de
[sC4mim][HSO4]_1.5 M (70.3±0.3)gh
[sC4mim][HSO4]_2.5 M (106.8±3.3)k
[mim][CF3CO2]_0.5 M (15.9±0.9)b
[mim][CF3CO2]_1.5 M (17.0±0.3)b
[mim][CF3CO2]_2.5 M (21.7±1.0)b

Data are presented as average value of three repetitions±standard deviation (N=3). ANOVA was used to compare the data; different letters indicate statistical differences between different solvents (Tukey’s test, p<0.05)