Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 May 31;79:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.015

Table 5. Hierarchical linear model testing impact of an alcohol-focused BMI on marijuana use frequency.

B SE t-ratio p
Intercept (pre-BMI) 13.60 1.14 11.95 <0.001
 Gender -3.68 1.76 -2.10 0.04
 Condition 0.73 1.77 0.41 0.68
3-month follow-up -2.00 0.90 -2.22 0.03
 Gender -1.65 1.36 -1.22 0.22
 Condition -0.35 1.38 -0.25 0.80
6-month follow-up -2.24 1.23 -1.82 0.07
 Gender -2.13 1.74 -1.23 0.22
 Condition 2.04 1.84 1.11 0.27
9-month follow-up -2.38 1.32 -1.81 0.07
 Gender -2.16 1.82 -1.19 0.24
 Condition 0.90 1.96 0.46 0.64

Note. Degrees of freedom = 225. BMI = Brief Motivational Intervention condition. MJ = marijuana. Assessment only was coded as 0; BMI was coded as 1. Gender was coded as 0 for males and 1 for females. HLM model equation is shown below, with coefficients corresponding to those listed in the table.

Level-1 Model

MJfrequencyti = π0i + π1i*(3moFU ti) + π2i*(6moFU ti) + π3i*(9moFU ti) + eti

Level-2 Model

π0i = β00 + β01*(GENDERi) + β02*(CONDITIONi) + r0i

π1i = β10 + β11*(GENDERi) + β12*(CONDITIONi) + r1i

π2i = β20 + β21*(GENDERi) + β22*(CONDITIONi) + r2i

π3i = β30 + β31*(GENDERi) + β32*(CONDITIONi) + r3i