Table 5. Hierarchical linear model testing impact of an alcohol-focused BMI on marijuana use frequency.
B | SE | t-ratio | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept (pre-BMI) | 13.60 | 1.14 | 11.95 | <0.001 |
Gender | -3.68 | 1.76 | -2.10 | 0.04 |
Condition | 0.73 | 1.77 | 0.41 | 0.68 |
3-month follow-up | -2.00 | 0.90 | -2.22 | 0.03 |
Gender | -1.65 | 1.36 | -1.22 | 0.22 |
Condition | -0.35 | 1.38 | -0.25 | 0.80 |
6-month follow-up | -2.24 | 1.23 | -1.82 | 0.07 |
Gender | -2.13 | 1.74 | -1.23 | 0.22 |
Condition | 2.04 | 1.84 | 1.11 | 0.27 |
9-month follow-up | -2.38 | 1.32 | -1.81 | 0.07 |
Gender | -2.16 | 1.82 | -1.19 | 0.24 |
Condition | 0.90 | 1.96 | 0.46 | 0.64 |
Note. Degrees of freedom = 225. BMI = Brief Motivational Intervention condition. MJ = marijuana. Assessment only was coded as 0; BMI was coded as 1. Gender was coded as 0 for males and 1 for females. HLM model equation is shown below, with coefficients corresponding to those listed in the table.
Level-1 Model
MJfrequencyti = π0i + π1i*(3moFU ti) + π2i*(6moFU ti) + π3i*(9moFU ti) + eti
Level-2 Model
π0i = β00 + β01*(GENDERi) + β02*(CONDITIONi) + r0i
π1i = β10 + β11*(GENDERi) + β12*(CONDITIONi) + r1i
π2i = β20 + β21*(GENDERi) + β22*(CONDITIONi) + r2i
π3i = β30 + β31*(GENDERi) + β32*(CONDITIONi) + r3i