Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Environ Econ Manage. 2017 Apr 5;85:81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.04.001

Table 5.

Heterogeneous effects of air quality, by income level and education

A. Hedonic unhappiness
Dependent variable Income level
Education
Hedonic unhappiness 0–25%
25–50%
50–75%
75–100%
Less educated (education<9)
More educated (education≥9)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

Dependent Variable mean 0.798 0.775 0.723 0.634 0.763 0.685
API(÷100) 0.258*** (0.086) 0.128** (0.062) 0.054 (0.052) 0.008 (0.042) 0.120*** (0.039) 0.072* (0.040)
Observations 5,176 5,617 6,468 7,798 12,185 13,488
Adjusted (within) R-squared 0.037 0.027 0.030 0.023 0.019 0.024

B. Mental well-being
Dependent variable Income level
Education
CES-D scores 0–25%
25–50%
50–75%
75–100%
Less educated (education<9)
More educated (education≥9)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

Dependent Variable mean 3.477 3.246 2.850 2.365 3.315 2.559
API (÷100) 1.038*** (0.306) 0.694*** (0.245) −0.127 (0.146) 0.109 (0.192) 0.543*** (0.169) 0.126 (0.134)
Observations 5,152 5,603 6,445 7,782 12,123 13,470
Adjusted (within) R-squared 0.047 0.036 0.038 0.029 0.023 0.028

C. Depressive symptoms
Dependent variable Income level
Education
Depressive symptoms 0–25%
25–50%
50–75%
75–100%
Less educated (education<9)
More educated (education≥9)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

Dependent Variable mean 0.375 0.349 0.305 0.254 0.355 0.277
API (÷100) 0.111*** 0.124*** −0.017 0.022 0.080*** 0.022
(0.031) (0.037) (0.024) (0.022) (0.020) (0.022)
Observations 5,152 5,603 6,445 7,782 12,123 13,470
Adjusted (within) R-squared 0.030 0.025 0.018 0.014 0.018 0.012

Source: China Family Panel Studies 2010 and 2014.

Note: Other covariates and fixed effects are the same as those in column (4) of Table 2. Robust standard errors, clustered at the county level, are presented in parentheses. CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale. API = air pollution index.

*

10% significance level.

**

5% significance level.

***

1% significance level.