. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 24.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Public Policy Law. 2015 Jun 22;21(3):280–294. doi: 10.1037/law0000048

Table 4.

Factors Predicting Regular Log Award for Experimental and Control Groups

Factor	B	SE	β	t	p
Constant	10.690	.212		50.541	.001
Factor 1 – plaintiff injuries/suffering	.438	.127	.222	3.443	.001
Factor 2 – numeracy/cognitive style	−.036	.130	−.018	−.274	.784
Factor 3 – motivation/effort	.045	.127	.023	.354	.723
Factor 4 – defendant perception/negligence	.330	.127	.167	2.599	.010
Factor 5 – economic damages/punishment	.062	.127	.031	.488	.626
Group (0 – control; 1 experimental)	.024	.270	.006	.089	.929
Adj. R²		.054
F		3.19				.005

Note. Regressions using log of lowest and highest awards yielded the same pattern of results.