Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2016 Aug 30;9(3):1154–1194. doi: 10.1137/15M1010919

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Exemplary registration results for the hand images (see Fig. 1). We report representative results from Tab. 2. The first three rows show results for plain smoothness regularization (γ = 0; first and second row: H2-regularization; third row: H1-regularization) for different choices of βv (top row: βv = 1E−3; second row: βv = 1E−4; third row: βv = 1E−2). The two rows from the bottom show results for a model with local adaptive compression (H1-regularization; γ = 1) for βv = 1E−2 and different choices for βw (bottom row: β2 = 1E−4; second row from the bottom: βw = 1E−3). We show (from left to right) (i) the residual differences after registration, (ii) a map of the determinant of the deformation gradient (the values are reported in Tab. 2; the color map is explained in §D of the appendix), (iii) the deformed template image m1 with a grid in overlay, and (iv) a close up of the latter for a particular area of interest (as identified by the inset in the images).