Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2017 May 4;198(5):1010–1020. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.097

Table 8.

Overview of search results for tobacco use and LUTS

LUTS Condition Studied Number articles Study Design Population Results Summary Comments

BPH17, 45-47, 66-68, 85, 86, 115-117 12 4-Cohort All Men Mixed results: 7-NS Some evidence for negative association, more evidence for no association
6-Cross- sectional 1- NS, S, +
2-Case-control
2- NS, S, -
2- S, -

Nocturia48, 50, 68-71 6 5-Cross-sectional 3-Women Mixed results: Inconsistent results
1-Cohort 2-Men 2- NS
1- NS, S, -
1- S, +
2- S, -

OAB/LUTS (non-UI)54, 61, 69, 71-74, 85, 86, 95, 109, 111, 113, 118-123 19 18-Cross- sectional 6-Women Mixed results: 7-NS Some evidence for a positive association, other evidence shows no association
11-Men
1-Cohort
2- Women and Men 3- NS, S, +
7- S, +
2- not reported

UI59, 69, 71, 73, 75-81, 118, 124 13 2-Case- control All Women Mixed results: 6-NS Some evidence for a positive association, other evidence shows no association
11-Cross- sectional 1- NS, S, +/-
3- S, +
1- S, +/-
2- not reported

Other- UDS & parameters plasma levels82-86 5 1-Case control 2-Women Mixed results: Outcomes varied, some evidence of associations
3- Men
1-Case series 2- NS, S, +
3-Cross- sectional 1- S, +
2- S, -

S = Statistically significant association, NS = Not statistically significant association, + = Positive association, - = Negative association