Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 23;8(46):80373–80392. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21268

Table 5. Comparison of the different methods’ performances on the SOS DNA repair network.

Method TPR FPR PPV ACC MCC AUC
GENIE3 0.500 0.208 0.546 0.694 0.299 0.684
ARACNE 0.708 0.625 0.362 0.486 0.083 0.739
NARROMI 0.667 0.458 0.421 0.583 0.197 0.791
Grow-shring 0.458 0.271 0.458 0.639 0.188 0.758
IAMB 0.583 0.229 0.560 0.708 0.351 0.809
DBNCS 0.667 0.229 0.593 0.736 0.426 0.813