Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 7;8(46):81088–81097. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19080

Table 1. Characteristics of all identified studies.

first author (ref) year country number (F) pathological classification molecular classification Surgery(%) method antibody source definition of Gil+ positive expression rate (%) median follow-up (m) survival analysis NOS score
1 Sandra A. O'Toole 2011 Australia 282 invasive ductal carcinoma/
ductal carcinoma in situ
NR NR IHC Santa Cruz ≥20% 31% NR OS 7
2 Lusheng Xu 2010 USA 171 infiltrating ductal carcinomas NR NR IHC Santa Cruz >2% 32.37% 93.6 CSS 7
3 Yumei Diao 2016 Sweden 126 NR ERα-positive NR NR NR NR NR NR DMFS 6
4 Shiwei Liu 2016 China 108 IBC HER2-positive 100% IHC Abcam IRS score≥7 39.81% 32 EFS、PFS 9
5 Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy 2012 U.S. 289 IBC NR NR IHC Sigma ≥10% Epithelial 69%, stromal 49% 96 OS、DFS 9
6 Yuan Li 2012 China 262 IBC All 100% IHC Santa Cruz score≥2* 33.59% 48.2 OS、DFS 7
7 Miao He 2015 China 290 NR NR 100% IHC Abcam IRS score≥3 54.80% NR OS、DFS 10
8 Haishan Zhao 2016 China 266 Invasive ductal carcinoma/
invasive lobular carcinoma
NR 100% IHC Abcam IRS score≥3 52.60% 48-77 OS、DFS 8
9 Anette ten Haaf 2009 Germany 204 IBC NR 100% IHC Santa Cruz IRS score≥7 97% 78 OS 10
10 Yinghua Li 2012 China 284 ductal and lobular cancer NR 100 IHC Santa Cruz IRS score≥7 83.10% 62 RFS 9
11 Soyoung Im 2013 Korea 334 IBC All 100 IHC Abcam IRS score≥4 42.20% 75.1 NR 8
12 Yajun Tao 2011 China 83 invasive ductal carcinomas/
invasive lobular carcinomas
All NR IHC Santa Cruz NR NR NR NR 10
13 Xin Ge 2015 China 117 NR NR NR IHC Santa Cruz IRS score≥5 NR NR NR 8

NR, not reference; IBC, invasive breast cancers; IHC, immunohistochemistry; IRS, immuno-reactive-score; DFS, disease free survival; OS, overall survival; CSS, cause free survival; EFS, event free survival; RFS, recurrence free survival; DMFS, distant metastasis free survival; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

The nuclear staining intensity: 0 and 3 (0 = negative, 1 = weak, 2 = moderate, and 3 = strong), the percentage of nuclear stained cells: 0 and 4 (1 ≤25%, 2 = 26−50 %, 3 = 51−75%, and 4 > 75%). IRS was calculated by multiplication of the two scores

*The expressions of Glil was scored as intensity of staining: 0(no staining), 1 (weak/moderate staining) or 2 (intense staining). Glil nuclear over-expression was identified for intensity cases with staining intensity of 2+.