Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 18;20(6):624–634. doi: 10.1007/s11102-017-0825-7

Table 3.

Comparison between patients with confirmed GHD and those without GHD

GHD (n = 14) Not GHD (n = 86) p-value
M/F 7/7 24/61 0.13a
Mean weight (kg) 88.3 ± 13.3 72.4 ± 14.2 <0.0001b
Mean BMI (kg/m2) 31.9 ± 3.9 26.6 ± 4.5 <0.0001b
Mean WHR 0.94 ± 0.07 0.88 ± 0.08 0.008b
Mean age at presentation (years) 52 ± 10 53 ± 10 0.73b
Mean time to screening (months) 34 ± 18 48 ± 32 0.25c
Mean age at screening (years) 55 ± 10 57 ± 10 0.66b
Procedure 0.11d
 None 3 11
 Endovascular coiling 7 60
 Clipping 2 13
 Multiple endovascular coiling 2 2
Site of aneurysm 0.61d
 Anterior circulation
  Anterior communicating artery 3 24
  Middle cerebral artery 2 17
  Posterior communicating artery 3 15
  Internal carotid artery 0 7
  Pericallosal artery 0 1
 Posterior circulation
  Basilar artery 1 5
  Posterior inferior cerebellar artery 0 3
  Vertebral artery 0 1
 Perimesencephalic 3 11
 Multiple aneurysms 2 2
WFNS 0.58d
 1 10 59
 2 3 10
 3 0 4
 4 1 2
 5 0 6
Fisher 0.57d
 1 3 10
 2 2 13
 3 1 10
 4 4 35
GOS 0.03a
 4 5 10
 5 9 76

Fisher grading on admission was not available for eight patients. WFNS grading on admission was not available for four patients

aChi-square test

b t test

cMann–Whitney U test

dFisher exact test