Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 20;8:816. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00816

Table 3.

Comparison of fold changes (FC) between RNAseq and qPCR.

Gene symbol PeM (N = 6) vs. BPR(N = 6)
RNAseq qPCR Gene
FC* FDR FC* p-value
gga_mitosRNA_H_1781 3.17 0.0395 5.67 0.0007850 12 S rRNA
gga_mitosRNA_H_2346_6 −2.28 0.0387 −1.36 0.0476534 16 S rRNA
gga_mitosRNA_H_4040 2.23 0.0156 2.02 0.0007420 tRNA-Leu
gga_mitosRNA_H_4957 5.23 0.0092 3.55 0.0000156 ND1
gga_mitosRNA_H_8083 3.40 0.0156 3.24 0.0014579 COX1
gga_mitosRNA_H_8272 3.17 0.0349 −2.40 0.0255489 tRNA-Asp
gga_mitosRNA_H_8487 4.77 0.0221 4.22 0.0001418 COX2
gga_mitosRNA_H_9163 3.14 0.0080 3.03 0.0000015 ATP8
gga_mitosRNA_H_10617 6.41 0.0218 2.48 0.0007107 COX3
gga_mitosRNA_H_11350 4.09 0.0218 4.39 0.0000091 ND4_L
gga_mitosRNA_H_11664 4.13 0.0049 4.62 0.0000016 ND4
gga_mitosRNA_H_15821 3.94 0.0048 5.81 0.0000010 CYTB
*

Values denote linear fold changes.