Table 3.

Patterns of resistance obtained in the enema samples by k‐means clustering

Cluster	Resistance pattern	Location	No. samples included in the pattern / No. total samples (%)	Multiresistant microbiomes (%)*
1	No resistance	Alajuela	9/29 (31.0)	0 (0)
		Guadalupe	13/55 (23.6)	0 (0)
		San José	9/41 (22.0)	0 (0)
		Tres Ríos	2/16 (12.5)	0 (0)
		Total	33/141 (23.4)	0 (0)
2	sulII +	Alajuela	5/29 (17.2)	2 (20)
		Guadalupe	7/55 (12.7)	0 (0)
		San José	8/41 (19.5)	6 (60)
		Tres Ríos	5/16 (31.3)	0 (0)
		Total	25/141 (17.7)	8 (80)
3	catI +, qnrS/sulII/tet(A)/tet(Q) −	Alajuela	5/29 (17.2)	0 (0)
		Guadalupe	12/55 (21.8)	0 (0)
		San José	7/41 (17.1)	0 (0)
		Tres Ríos	4/16 (25.0)	0 (0)
		Total	28/141 (19.9)	0 (0)
4	qnrS +, sulI/sulII −	Alajuela	1/29 (3.4)	0 (0)
		Guadalupe	5/55 (9.1)	0 (0)
		San José	2/41 (4.9)	1 (10)
		Tres Ríos	2/16 (12.5)	0 (0)
		Total	10/141 (7.1)	1 (10)
5	tet(Q) +, qnrS/sulII −	Alajuela	2/29 (6.9)	0 (0)
		Guadalupe	8/55 (14.5)	0 (0)
		San José	4/41 (9.8)	0 (0)
		Tres Ríos	1/16 (6.3)	0 (0)
		Total	15/141 (10.6)	0 (0)
6	tet(A) +, qnrS/sulII/tet(Q) −	Alajuela	1/29 (3.4)	0 (0)
		Guadalupe	2/55 (3.6)	0 (0)
		San José	2/41 (4.9)	0 (0)
		Tres Ríos	1/16 (6.3)	0 (0)
		Total	6/141 (4.3)	0 (0)
7	sulI +, catI/sulII/tet(Q) −	Alajuela	6/29 (20.7)	0 (0)
		Guadalupe	7/55 (12.7)	0 (0)
		San José	8/41 (19.5)	0 (0)
		Tres Ríos	1/16 (6.3)	1 (10)
		Total	22/141 (15.6)	1 (10)
8	bla TEM +, rest −	Alajuela	0/29 (0)	0 (0)
		Guadalupe	1/55 (1.8)	0 (0)
		San José	1/41 (2.4)	0 (0)
		Tres Ríos	0/16 (0)	0 (0)
		Total	2/141 (1.4)	0 (0)

*Number of ‘multiresistant microbiomes’. The percentage was calculated from the total number of ‘multiresistant microbiomes’ (n = 10).