Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 1;36(24):3858–3874. doi: 10.1002/sim.7397

Table 2.

A comparison of the prediction accuracy using dynLoDA and dynCI schemes

dynCI dynCI dynCI dynCI
dynLoDA 99% HPDCI 95% HPDCI 90% HPDCI 50% HPDCI
Cutoff 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83
Sensitivity (classified data) 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.93
Sensitivity 0.93 0.86 0.89 0.89 0.93
Specificity (classified data) 0.92 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.91
Specificity 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.90
PCC (classified data) 0.92 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.91
PCC 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90
AUC 0.97 0.98 0.98 0.97 0.97
PPV 0.56 0.69 0.63 0.61 0.55
NPV 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Proportion unclassified 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.01
Mean lead time (days) 675 565 595 614 661
Mean prediction time (days) 857 972 942 918 872

Note. The sensitivities and specificities highlighted in bold are calculated without considering the unclassified patients.

AUC, area under curve; HPDCI, highest posterior density credible interval; NPV, negative predictive value; PCC, probability of correct classification; PPV, positive predictive value.