Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 24;17:842. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4865-8

Table 2.

Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for associations between baseline (Phase 1) body weight status and socioeconomic disadvantage at Phases 1–3 among women, repeated measures analysis (GEE), the Helsinki Health Study, Finland, 2000–2012

Model 1a Model 2b
Low household net income Odds ratio 95% CI Odds ratio 95% CI
 Normal weight 1.00 ref. 1.00 ref.
 Overweight 1.01 0.91–1.12 1.10 0.97–1.24
 Obese 1.23 1.07–1.41 1.21 1.04–1.41
 Number of subjects 6809 6807
 QICC* 18,349.35 11,836.38
Income below poverty
 Normal weight 1.00 ref. 1.00 ref.
 Overweight 1.03 0.90–1.17 1.06 0.94–1.21
 Obese 1.23 1.05–1.44 1.20 1.02–1.4
 Number of subjects 6809 6807
 QICC 12,114.43 10,799.45
Frequent economic difficulties
 Normal weight 1.00 ref. 1.00 ref.
 Overweight 1.21 1.08–1.35 1.23 1.10–1.37
 Obese 1.74 1.52–1.99 1.71 1.50–1.96
 Number of subjects 6836.00 6832.00
 QICC 17,112.79 16,468.48
Low household wealth
 Normal weight 1.00 ref. 1.00 ref.
 Overweight 1.24 1.08–1.43 1.25 1.09–1.44
 Obese 1.90 1.59–2.26 1.90 1.59–2.26
 Number of subjects 5747 5743
 QICC 9268.02 9157.90
Low personal income
 Normal weight 1.00 ref.
 Overweight 1.17 1.03–1.33
 Obese 1.22 1.03–1.44
 Number of subjects 4623
 QICC 10,130.52

CI Confidence interval

Weight category defined by body mass index (normal weight BMI 18.50–24.99, overweight BMI 25.00–29.99 and obese BMI >30.00)

*Corrected Quasi Likelihood under Independence Model Criterion (in smaller-is-better form)

aAdjusted for age and educational level

bAdditionally adjusted for marital status as a time variant covariate