Table 1.
Comparison between the two approaches used to estimate excess female under-5 mortality
Hill and Upchurch7 | Alkema et al2 | |
Type | Prescriptive | Descriptive |
Data | Historical series from four Northwestern European countries (England and Wales, France, the Netherlands and Sweden) and New Zealand, between 1820 and 1964 | All available data from vital registration systems, sample registration and surveillance systems, surveys and censuses from 195 countries since 1950. |
Age ranges | Infant (<1 year), child (1–4 years) and under 5 (<5 years) | |
Intended to reflect sex differentials in childhood mortality in the absence of substantial discrimination, but at relatively high levels of child mortality. Described by the authors as a mortality ‘standard’. | Intended to reflect actual sex ratios in mortality, regardless of the presence of gender bias. Country-specific sex ratios are presented; these results are based on the product of the expected sex ratio and a country-specific multiplier, which represents the relative advantage or disadvantage of girls to boys compared with other countries with similar total mortality rates. | |
Original estimates | ||
Assessment of gender bias | Female advantage index (difference between the observed and expected female/male mortality ratios) for any given level of male mortality | Countries with outlying sex ratios. Excess female mortality expressed as the difference between the expected and estimated female mortality rates |