Table 5.
Odds of Having Sensory Monofixation (versus Bifoveal Fixation) According to Baseline Factors
| Independent Factor | Odds Ratio (99% CI)a | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| Associations at Distance | ||
| Distance Controlbd | 1.49 (1.24 to 1.80) | <0.001 |
| Distance Angle (Δ)c | 1.02 (0.99 to 1.06) | 0.15 |
| Anisometropia (Yes vs. No) | 1.72 (0.84 to 3.54) | 0.05 |
| Associations at Near | ||
| Near Controlbd | 1.42 (1.16 to 1.73) | <0.001 |
| Near Angle (Δ)c | 1.01 (0.99 to 1.04) | 0.26 |
| Anisometropia (Yes vs. No) | 1.43 (0.71 to 2.89) | 0.19 |
a
Table displays the odds of having sensory monofixation versus bifoveal fixation, computed using logistic regression models that adjust for prior treatment and the presence of anisometropia, where applicable.
b
Results displayed represent the change in the odds of having sensory monofixation associated with a 1 point increase (worsening) in exotropia control score
c
Results displayed represent the change in the odds of having monofixation associated with a 10PD increase in angle of deviation
d
Associations considered statistically significant (p≤0.01).
Δ=Prism diopters