. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 25.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 Mar;120(2):125–144. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-120.2.125

Table 2.

Spearman Correlations among Raw Scores from Language Assessments for Infants with Fragile X Syndrome at 12 months of Age (n = 13)

Variable	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1. Age	—
2. MSEL receptive	.14	—
3. MSEL expressive	.50^*	.71^**	—
4. ELM-2 receptive	−.15	.58^*	.62^*	—
5. ELM-2 expressive	−.39	.12	−.03	.50^*	—
6. REEL-2 receptive^a	.03	.79^**	.76^**	.78^**	.50^*	—
7. REEL-2 expressive^a	.02	.58^*	.55^*	.64^*	.75^**	.77^**	—
8. CDI understood	.17	.29	.17	.14	.01	.35	−.09	—
9. CDI produced	.32	.56^*	.44	.37	.33	.61^*	.54^*	.31	—
10. VABS receptive	.04	.05	.31	.50^*	.45	.55^*	.47	.11	.30	—
11. VABS expressive	−.20	.55^*	.31	.24	.32	.67^**	.51^*	.36	.47	.26	—
12. CSBS	−.13	.65^**	.58^*	.62^*	.16	.78^**	.61^*	.29	.26	.49^*	.73^**	—

Age-equivalent scores.

p < .05, one-tailed.

^**

p < .01, one-tailed.