Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 25.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2016 Apr 1;134:281–294. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.051

Table 7.

Comparing the within-site ICC before and after leave-one-out scaling factor calibration with the cross-sectional freesurfer results of [39], where scanners were standardized, and the average within-site ICC is shown. The within-site ICCs of our study fall within the range of [39], which shows the that sites in this study are as reliable as those in [39].

ROI ICC WI ICC WI Cal [39] ICC WI Average
LV 1 1 .998 ± 0.002
Thal .86 .84 0.765 ± .183
Hipp .93 .93 0.878 ± .132
Amyg .89 .86 0.761 ± .134
Caud .97 .97 0.909 ± 0.092