Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Pediatr. 2017 Apr 25;18(2):172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.04.020

Table 5. Educational Media Exposure, as Predicted by Lagged StimQ and Subscales (n = 149).

Outcome Model 1* Model 2 Model 3
Variable β (SE) Obs P value β (SE) Obs P value β (SE) Obs P value
Lagged StimQ 0.25 (0.06) 303 <.001 0.20 (0.06) 299 .001 0.20(0.07) 293 .002
Lagged PVR 0.17 (0.06) 305 .003 0.15 (0.06) 301 .006 0.15(0.06) 295 .006
Lagged PIDA 0.19 (0.06) 304 .001 0.20 (0.06) 300 .001 0.20(0.06) 294 .001
Lagged READ 0.13 (0.06) 306 .04 0.07 (0.06) 302 .27 0.06(0.06) 296 .333
Lagged ALM 0.12 (0.06) 305 .05 0.08 (0.06) 301 .18 0.07(0.06) 295 .237

Abbreviations: β, standardized coefficient; SE, standard error; Obs, observations; PVR, Parental Verbal Responsivity; PIDA, Parental Involvement in Developmental Advance; READ, Reading Activities; ALM, Availability of Learning Materials

*

Adjusted for child's age.

Adjusted for child's age, gender, and birth order, exposure to non-educational media (minutes) and mother's age, ethnicity, marital status, country of origin, educational level, language of interview, and depressive symptoms.

Adjusted for all above confounders and child's language