Table 1.
Classification | Rater #1 | Rater #2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
†Goutallier | |||||
| |||||
Grade 0–1 (low fat) | 11 | 9 | |||
| |||||
Grade 2–4 (high fat) | 6 | 8 | |||
| |||||
†Fuchs | |||||
| |||||
Grade 0 (low fat) | 11 | 9 | |||
| |||||
Grade 1–2 (high fat) | 6 | 8 | |||
| |||||
Histology | |||||
| |||||
Muscle Belly | Muscle/Tendon Junction | ||||
|
|
||||
Rater #1 | Rater #2 | Rater #1 | Rater #2 | ||
| |||||
Grade 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
| |||||
Grade 1 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | |
| |||||
Grade 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | |
| |||||
Grade 3 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | |
| |||||
Grade 4 | - | - | 1 | 1 |
Data shown represents the number of specimens in each category for all raters.
Grading for both classification systems were grouped as low and high fat specimens.