Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 25;7:14040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14424-7

Table 2.

Clusters for human-nonhuman distinction identified with the searchlight MVPA using a cross-validation approach for decoding scheme 1 and 2 (chance accuracy is 50%) and the conjunction of the maps obtained by the two schemes.

Cluster Peak
t p accuracy size t p accuracy x y z
Decoding Scheme 1 (train: man vs. chicken, test: baby vs. cat)
L pSTS 4.185 0.0005* 56.7 251 5.287 0.00004 57.9 −45 −52 22
L PCC 4.328 0.0004* 56.5 359 5.576 0.00002 57.7 −9 −46 16
R IOG 4.43 0.0003* 58 484 5.757 0.00001 60.7 12 −82 −17
L IOG 4.258 0.0005* 56.9 2257 5.578 0.00002 58.3 −16 −100 −8
Decoding Scheme 2 (train: man vs. cat test: baby vs. chicken)
L pSTS 4.351 0.0005 56 1825 5.829 0.00001 58.3 −48 −45 13
L PCC 3.978 0.0008 56.2 667 4.675 0.00014 58 −6 −46 22
Conjunction
L pSTS 3.411 0.0031 55.9 69 4.264 0.00038 56.9 −48 −58 19
L PCC 3.393 0.0031 55.4 202 3.864 0.00097 56 −12 −43 22

Statistical maps of classification accuracy in %; size in mm3. The results of Decoding Scheme 2 are cluster-based corrected using Monte Carlo simulations (10.000 iterations). The results of Decoding Scheme 1 are uncorrected. *Values uncorrected at cluster level; R, right; L, left; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; IOG, inferior occipital gyrus; pSTS, posterior superior temporal sulcus.