Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 4;18(11):1336–1349. doi: 10.1111/obr.12588

Table 2.

Overview of included papers, with details on their inclusion in reporting on sucrose, SSBs, confectionery and determinants of change in consumption, and quality assessment score

Reference Study name Country where study situated Sample size and cohort characteristics* Mean ages included (years) Year at mean age 13 Method of diet data collection Sucrose or added sugar SSBs Confectio‐nery Determi‐nants Quality assessment score
Adair LS et al. (2005) 36 Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Study (CLHBS) Philippines n range from 2040 to 2106 15, 19 1996 Two 24‐h dietary recalls X G X X 6
Ambrosini GL et al. (2013) 3 Western Australian Pregnancy (Raine) cohort Australia n range from 1009 to 1667 14, 17 2002–2005 FFQ X N/P X X 8
Astrom, A. N. et al. (2004) 49 The Norwegian Longitudinal Health Behaviour (NLHB) Study Norway n range from 627 to 963 15, 18, 19, 21, 23 1990 Questionnaire X D X 7
Bruno‐Ambrosius, K. et al. (2005) 47 Sweden n = 162, all female 13, 14, 15 2000 Questionnaire X N/P N/P X 5
Davis, J. N. et al. (2009) 43 Study of Latino Adolescents at Risk for Diabetes (SOLAR) cohort US n = 85, all Latino 14, 15 2002 Two 24‐h dietary recalls X X 6
Deheeger, M. et al. (2002) 63 The French longitudinal study of growth and nutrition (FLSGN) France n = 94 14, 16 1998 (estimated) Diet history method interview X X X 7
Falbe, J. et al. (2014) 37 Growing Up Today Study II (GUTS2) US n = 8,272 15, 17 2004 FFQ X 8
Feeley, A. et al. (2012) 48 Birth to Twenty (Bt20) study South Africa n = 1,451 13, 15, 17 2003 Questionnaire X X 6
Fiorito, L. M. et al. (2010) 64 US n = 166, all female, non‐Hispanic white 13, 15 2004 Three 24‐h dietary recalls X X 6
Kvaavik, E. et al. (2005) 45 The Oslo Youth Study (OYS) Norway n = 443 14, 25 1979 Questionnaire X N/P X X 6
Laska, M. N. et al. (2012) 38 Identifying Determinants of Eating and Activity (IDEA) and the Aetiology of Childhood Obesity (ECHO). US n = 562 to 666 14, 16 IDEA: 2005–2006 ECHO: 2006–2007 (estimated) Three 24‐h dietary recalls X X X 8
Lee, A. K. et al. (2015) 65 National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Growth Health Study (NGHS) US N = 840 to 1,304 13, 16 1991 Three day food records X X X 8
Lien, N. et al. (2002) 50 The Norwegian Longitudinal Health Behaviour (NLHB) Study Norway n = 380 to 613 15, 21 1990 Questionnaire X D D 6
Lipsky, L. M. et al. (2015) 39 NEXT Generation Health Study (NEXT) US n = 2,172 to 2,785 16, 17, 18, 19 2006–2007 Questionnaire X X 5
Ovrebo, E. M. (2011) 46 Norway n = 583 to 606 13, 15 2002 FFQ X N/P N/P X 7
Patterson, E. et al. (2009) 32 European Youth Heart Study (EYHS) Sweden n = 179, older cohort 15, 21 1996–1997 Single 24‐h dietary recall X 8
Pearson, N. et al. (2011) 44 The Youth Eating Patterns (YEP) study Australia n = 1,729 13, 15 2004–2005 FFQ X X X 8
Quick, V. et al. (2013) 42 Project EAT US n = 2,134 15, 25 1996–1997 FFQ X X X 7
Stephens, L. D. et al. (2014) 51 The Youth Eating Patterns (YEP) study Australia n = 529, all low SES 12–15, 14–17 (2 year follow‐up) n/r Baseline assessment in 2004–2005 FFQ X D X 7
Striegel‐Moore, R. H. et al. (2006) 40 National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Growth Health Study (NGHS) US n = 1944 to 2110, all female 13, 15, 16, 18 1991 Three day food records X X X 7
Thuen, F. et al. (2015) 41 The Norwegian Longitudinal Health Behaviour (NLHB) Study Norway n = 480 to 649 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, 23, 30 1990 Questionnaire X X 5
Von Post‐Skagegard, M. et al. (2002) 33 Sweden n = 208 15, 17, 20 1991–1992 FFQ X 7
White, J. et al. (2014) 66 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth Health Study (NGHS) US n = 774 16, 19 1991 Three day food records X X X 7
Zarrazquin, I. et al. (2014) 34 Spain n = 285 to 366 19, 20, 21 n/r FFQ X X N/P X 6
*

Cohort characteristics are only reported here where there is substantial deviation from the general population of that country, e.g. all participants are of a single sex or ethnicity.

For each outcome: X = not reported, D = duplicate: another paper from the same study was selected as the primary paper to represent that study, ✔ = included, G = included in graphs but not meta‐analysis, N/P = data extraction or data conversion not possible.

FFQ, food‐frequency questionnaire; n/r, not reported; US, United States of America.