Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 27;147(11):2109–2117. doi: 10.3945/jn.117.255356

TABLE 3.

Per protocol analyses for blood and cognitive outcomes in Rwandan female college students randomly assigned to conventional or iron-biofortified beans for 18 wk1

Baseline effect
Group effect
Variables by outcome F MSE Inline graphic F MSE Inline graphic
Blood
 Hemoglobin 578.3*** 215 0.80 12.7*** 5 0.08
 Ferritin 119.1*** 16 0.45 8.5** 1 0.06
 Transferrin receptor 237.9*** 830 0.63 0.1 0 0.00
 Body iron2 278.4*** 650 0.66 7.5** 18 0.05
SRT task RT 17.9*** 21,812 0.11 0.0 5 0.00
GNG task RT 64.0*** 100,546 0.31 1.4 2227 0.01
ANT RT
 0 Cues 79.8*** 229,369 0.36 0.0 61 0.00
 2 Cues 53.3*** 212,450 0.28 0.6 2327 0.00
 Alerting 5.5* 11,944 0.04 0.0 37 0.00
 Center cue 78.6*** 246,784 0.36 0.2 603 0.00
 Spatial cues 64.3*** 194,872 0.31 3.6+ 10,828 0.02
 Orienting 0.1 220 0.00 9.9** 19,353 0.07
 Consistent flankers 92.1*** 278,638 0.40 0.1 347 0.00
 Inconsistent flankers 105.8*** 297,102 0.43 0.3 703 0.00
 Conflict 12.0*** 27,639 0.08 0.0 59 0.00
CRT
 Sensitivity (d′) 2.6 1 0.02 15.1*** 6 0.09
 PCC 3.8+ 9599 0.03 10.3** 26,278 0.07
 RT
  New items 32.8*** 487,279 0.18 16.6*** 247,301 0.11
  Old items 28.0*** 294,491 0.17 27.4*** 288,113 0.16
 Bias (c) 1.1 0 0.01 24.4*** 2 0.14
SMS task RT
 Intercept
  New 5.2* 72,774 0.04 19.7*** 275,685 0.12
  Old 27.5*** 502,669 0.16 15.6*** 284,449 0.09
 Slope
  New 3.6+ 1092 0.03 42.6*** 12,779 0.23
  Old 1.3 966 0.01 20.5*** 15,594 0.13
1

Assessed using a generalized linear model regressing endline on group, controlling for baseline. +P < 0.1; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. ANT, attentional network task; CRT, cued recognition task; GNG, go/no-go; MSE, mean SE; PCC, percentage change in capacity; RT, reaction time; SMS, Sternberg memory search; SRT, simple reaction time; Inline graphic, proportion of variance accounted for.

2

Calculated using Cook’s equation (26).