Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Anat Pathol. 2017 Nov;24(6):372–378. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000169

Table 3.

Probability of identifying a germline Lynch Syndrome mutation based on microsatellite instability testing or immunohistochemistry result.14,17,23,32

Mircosatellite Instability/Immunohistochemistry Result Probability of identifying a germline mutation Advantages Disadvantages
MSI-High 21%
  1. MSI-high when mutations results in expression of non-functional mismatch repair protein

  2. MSI-High when mismatch repair proteins other than MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2 are mutated

  1. Requires more tissue and a source of normal

  2. Requires tissue microdissection prior to PCR

  3. Decreased sensitivity in tissues outside the colon

  4. MSI-L in endometrial cancer is of uncertain significance

  5. Mutations in MSH6 are more often associated with MSI-L or MSS

Any type of IHC loss 21%
  1. Lower cost

  2. Loss of protein expression points to specific gene affected

  3. Technique is more widely available

  4. Requires less tissue

  1. Mutations resulting in expression of non-functional proteins result in intact IHC

  2. Expression of some proteins, especially MSH6, can be focal

  3. Requires individual pathologist interpretation

  4. Loss of MLH1 requires subsequent PCR-based MLH1 promoter methylation analysis

 IHC loss of MLH1/PMS2 (and absence of MLH1 promoter methylation) 33%
 IHC loss of MSH2/MSH6 67%
 IHC loss of MSH6 24%
 IHC loss of PMS2 62%