Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 27;8:1152. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01177-0

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Neutron scattering intensity I(k,ω) within the nnHK model. ac Detailed results for Model 1 (J 1 = −2.2, K 1 = +7.4 meV): a I(k,ω) computed via LSWT; results are averaged over the three zigzag ordering wavectors, parallel to the X-bonds, Y-bonds, and Z-bonds. Inset: Definition of Brillouin zone and high-symmetry k-points. b ED results, combining data from several 20-site and 24-site periodic clusters (see “Methods”). c ED k-dependence of I(k,ω) integrated over the indicated energies, as obtained from a single 24-site cluster respecting all symmetries of Eq. (1) (see “Methods”). d Comparison of Γ-point intensities for the K 1 = +7.7 meV AFM spin liquid (exact results53, 54), Model 1 (ED), and the experimental data for α-RuCl3 12. e Evolution of the ED Γ-point intensity with decreasing J1K1, showing absence of low-energy intensity close to the K 1 > 0 spin liquid. The top three interaction sets correspond to zigzag order, while the bottom is the K 1 > 0 spin liquid. For all spectra, a Gaussian broadening of 0.5 meV has been applied