Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 14;10(6):1535–1545. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12486

Table 3.

ALDH‐ and ADH‐specific activities in Pyrococcus furiosus strains and bacterial crude extracts

Strain ALDH activitya (acetyl‐CoA) ADH activitya (acetaldehyde)
NADH NADPH NADH NADPH
Control strains
COM1 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05b
ΔAOR < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05b
AdhA < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.94
P. furiosus AdhE expression strains
Te‐AdhEA 0.58 < 0.05 0.48 1.66
Te‐AdhE 0.29 < 0.05 1.00 0.07
TxAdhE 0.17 < 0.05 0.53 < 0.05
Gt‐AdhE < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Dk‐AdhE < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05
Af‐AdhE < 0.05 < 0.05 0.05 < 0.05
Gs‐AdhE < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Tc‐AdhE < 0.05 < 0.05 0.06 < 0.05
Ct‐AdhE < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Mutant AdhE expression strains
Te‐AdhE* 0.44 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Tx‐AdhE* 0.72 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
AdhE in the native organism
C. thermocellum 4.96 0.06 19.42 < 0.05
T. sp. strain X514 0.18 0.02 1.09 3.38
T. ethanolicus 0.70 < 0.05 2.82 6.96
a

Specific activities are listed as μmol NAD(P)H oxidized min−1 mg−1. The detection limit for these assays is ~0.05 U mg−1.

b

ADH activity in the forward reaction was not detected at 65°C; however, the reverse assay resulted in 0.2 U mg−1 of ethanol oxidation using NADP as the electron acceptor at 80°C.