Table 3.
Annual number of women screened and randomized per countrya
| Argentina | South Africa | Zimbabwe | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | S | R | S | R | S | R | S | R |
| 2011 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 33 (80.5%) | 0 | 0 | 41 | 33 (80.5%) |
| 2012 | 0 | 0 | 347 | 143 (41.2%) | 300 | 75 (25.0%) | 647 | 218 (33.7%) |
| 2013 | 92 | 50 (54.3%) | 319 | 179 (56.1%) | 161 | 77 (47.8%) | 572 | 306 (53.5%) |
| 2014 | 55 | 31 (56.4%) | 489 | 280 (57.3%) | 103 | 58 (56.3%) | 647 | 369 (57.0%) |
| 2015 | 43 | 36 (83.7%) | 368 | 217 (59.0%) | 74 | 45 (60.8%) | 485 | 298 (61.4%) |
| 2016 | 0 | 0 | 129 | 103 (79.8%) | 42 | 27 (64.3%) | 171 | 130 (76.0%) |
| Total (%) | 190 | 117 (61.6%) | 1693 | 955 (56.4%) | 680 | 282 (41.5%) | 2563 | 1354 (52.8%) |
Abbreviations: S screened, R randomized (the numbers in brackets is the percentage recruited of those screened)
aRecruitment commenced in South Africa in July 2011, in Zimbabwe in January 2012, and in Argentina in February 2013