Table 2.
Relationship of resorption rates of materials in the root canals and roots
ZOE | Vitapex | MPRCF | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | N | % | |
6 months | ||||||
A | 48 | 94.1 | 23 | 41.1 | 32 | 68.2 |
B | 0 | 0 | 27 | 48.2 | 0 | 0 |
C | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 |
D | 2 | 3.9 a | 4 | 7.1 b | 21 | 31.8 ab |
E | 1 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
12 months | ||||||
A | 32 | 62.7 | 10 | 17.9 | 26 | 49.1 |
B | 0 | 0 | 14 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
C | 0 | 0 | 28 | 50 | 3 | 5.7 |
D | 3 | 5.9a | 4 | 7.1b | 24 | 45.2ab |
E | 16 | 31.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
18 months | ||||||
A | 25 | 49.0 | 7 | 12.5 | 20 | 37.7 |
B | 0 | 0 | 16 | 28.6 | 2 | 3.6 |
C | 0 | 0 | 31 | 55.4 | 4 | 7.5 |
D | 6 | 11.8a | 2 | 3.5b | 27 | 50.9ab |
E | 20 | 39.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 51 | 100 | 56 | 100 | 53 | 100 |
A: both no changes, B: root no change but filling resorbed, C: root began resorption, filling resorbed at faster rate, D: root began resorption, filling resorbed at same rate, E: root began resorption, filling resorbed at slower rate
amean the proportions of resorption at same rate were significantlly different between ZOE group and MPRCF group
bmean the proportions of resorption at same rate were significantlly different between Vitapex group and MPRCF group