Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 27;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s13005-017-0145-1

Table 2.

Relationship of resorption rates of materials in the root canals and roots

ZOE Vitapex MPRCF
N % N % N %
6 months
 A 48 94.1 23 41.1 32 68.2
 B 0 0 27 48.2 0 0
 C 0 0 2 3.6 0 0
 D 2 3.9 a 4 7.1 b 21 31.8 ab
 E 1 2.0 0 0 0 0
12 months
 A 32 62.7 10 17.9 26 49.1
 B 0 0 14 25 0 0
 C 0 0 28 50 3 5.7
 D 3 5.9a 4 7.1b 24 45.2ab
 E 16 31.4 0 0 0 0
18 months
 A 25 49.0 7 12.5 20 37.7
 B 0 0 16 28.6 2 3.6
 C 0 0 31 55.4 4 7.5
 D 6 11.8a 2 3.5b 27 50.9ab
 E 20 39.2 0 0 0 0
Total 51 100 56 100 53 100

A: both no changes, B: root no change but filling resorbed, C: root began resorption, filling resorbed at faster rate, D: root began resorption, filling resorbed at same rate, E: root began resorption, filling resorbed at slower rate

amean the proportions of resorption at same rate were significantlly different between ZOE group and MPRCF group

bmean the proportions of resorption at same rate were significantlly different between Vitapex group and MPRCF group