Table S1.
Item no | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.00 | 0.433 | 0.588 | 0.530 | 0.530 | 0.547 | 0.418 | 0.497 | 0.500 | 0.524 | 0.512 | 0.582 |
2 | 0.433 | 1.00 | 0.526 | 0.458 | 0.429 | 0.399 | 0.299 | 0.402 | 0.453 | 0.410 | 0.430 | 0.470 |
3 | 0.588 | 0.526 | 1.00 | 0.714 | 0.658 | 0.655 | 0.346 | 0.617 | 0.535 | 0.572 | 0.565 | 0.652 |
4 | 0.530 | 0.458 | 0.714 | 1.00 | 0.634 | 0.642 | 0.298 | 0.606 | 0.457 | 0.502 | 0.521 | 0.599 |
5 | 0.530 | 0.429 | 0.658 | 0.634 | 1.00 | 0.716 | 0.341 | 0.684 | 0.507 | 0.492 | 0.548 | 0.602 |
6 | 0.547 | 0.399 | 0.655 | 0.642 | 0.716 | 1.00 | 0.425 | 0.685 | 0.576 | 0.611 | 0.625 | 0.677 |
7 | 0.418 | 0.299 | 0.346 | 0.298 | 0.341 | 0.425 | 1.00 | 0.463 | 0.567 | 0.555 | 0.574 | 0.468 |
8 | 0.497 | 0.402 | 0.617 | 0.606 | 0.684 | 0.685 | 0.463 | 1.00 | 0.647 | 0.624 | 0.609 | 0.669 |
9 | 0.500 | 0.453 | 0.535 | 0.457 | 0.507 | 0.576 | 0.567 | 0.647 | 1.00 | 0.715 | 0.670 | 0.680 |
10 | 0.524 | 0.410 | 0.572 | 0.502 | 0.492 | 0.611 | 0.555 | 0.624 | 0.715 | 1.00 | 0.825 | 0.757 |
11 | 0.512 | 0.430 | 0.565 | 0.521 | 0.548 | 0.625 | 0.574 | 0.609 | 0.670 | 0.825 | 1.00 | 0.756 |
12 | 0.582 | 0.470 | 0.652 | 0.599 | 0.602 | 0.677 | 0.468 | 0.669 | 0.680 | 0.757 | 0.756 | 1.00 |
Notes: The correlation between the variables was examined by creating a correlation matrix. Because the MUR-PSQ-v2 was constructed to measure one concept (patient satisfaction with an MUR), there is an expectation that the variables will correlate with each other. However, any variable with a consistently low correlation (less than 0.2) with other variables is potentially redundant. Equally, a variable with a consistently high correlation (over 0.8) would cause multilinearity problems during factor analysis and might also need removing.
Abbreviation: MUR-PSQ-v2, Medicines Use Review patient satisfaction questionnaire, version 2.