Table 3.
The results of multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for the prediction of major coronary heart disease events during follow-up
| Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | P value | |
|---|---|---|
| Model adjusted for age and gender | ||
| Number of coronary segments with CAC | 1.31 (1.18–1.45) | <0.001 |
| Number of coronary arteries with CAC | 2.29 (1.66–3.18) | <0.001 |
| Proximal dominant coronary artery CAC | 4.83 (2.35–9.91) | <0.001 |
| Model adjusted for Framingham risk score | ||
| Number of coronary segments with CAC | 1.28 (1.16–1.42) | <0.001 |
| Number of coronary arteries with CAC | 2.20 (1.61–3.02) | <0.001 |
| Proximal dominant coronary artery CAC | 4.68 (2.28–9.61) | <0.001 |
| Model adjusted for Framingham risk score and CAC score categories (1–100, 101–300, >300) | ||
| Number of coronary segments with CAC | 1.14 (0.99–1.32) | 0.07 |
| Number of coronary arteries with CAC | 1.68 (1.10–2.57) | 0.02 |
| Proximal dominant coronary artery CAC | 2.59 (1.15–5.83) | 0.02 |
| Model adjusted for Framingham risk score and log-transformed CAC score | ||
| Number of coronary segments with CAC | 1.09 (0.93–1.28) | 0.31 |
| Number of coronary arteries with CAC | 1.53 (1.00–2.36) | 0.05 |
| Proximal dominant coronary artery CAC | 2.35 (1.05–5.29) | 0.04 |