Table 4.
rFPN resting state functional connectivity differences between MwoA patients and healthy controls at baseline | Association between VAS and rFPN resting state functional connectivity in MwoA patients at baseline | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contrast | Voxels | Brain Region | MNI (x, y, z) | Z | Contrast | Voxels | Brain Region | MNI (x, y, z) | Z | ||||
|
|
||||||||||||
HC>MwoA | 884 | L/R Precuneus | −6 | −58 | 46 | 4.12 | Positive | 358 | L/R precunues | 4 | −60 | 54 | 3.78 |
|
|
||||||||||||
595 | L SII | −54 | −32 | 22 | 4.17 | 349 | L Sup Frontal G | −14 | 68 | 10 | 4.14 | ||
|
|
||||||||||||
689 | L Lingual G | −10 | −98 | −16 | 4.54 | 191 | R/L pgACC/mPFC | −4 | 44 | 0 | 3.54 | ||
|
|||||||||||||
829 | L Fusiform G/Mid/Sup Temporal G | −46 | −52 | −10 | 4.48 | ||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
426 | R Lingual/Cuneus | 18 | −84 | 4 | 4.17 | ||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
1086 | R Sup/Mid/Inf Tempotal G | 38 | −74 | −4 | 4.57 | ||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
273 | R Cerebellum | 40 | −40 | −28 | 4.72 | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
MwoA>HC | No brain region above the threshold | Negative | 162 | R Inf Temporal G | 52 | −14 | −32 | 4.22 | |||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Changes of rFPN resting state functional connectivity in MwoA patients before and after acupuncture treatment | Association between VAS changes (post minus pre) and corresponding rFPN functional connectivity changes in MwoA patients | ||||||||||||
Contrast | Voxels | Brain Region | MNI (x, y, z) | Z | Contrast | Voxels | Brain Region | MNI (x, y, z) | Z | ||||
|
|
||||||||||||
Pre>Post | 569 | R Precuneus | 22 | −62 | 40 | 4.02 | Positive | 212 | L/R Precuneus | −2 | −70 | 34 | 3.39 |
|
|
||||||||||||
195 | L Mid Frontal G | −38 | 34 | 14 | 3.59 | 268 | R Postcentral G | 14 | −34 | 72 | 3.87 | ||
|
|
||||||||||||
Post>Pre | 183 | R/L dorsal PCC | 10 | −38 | 24 | 3.74 | Negative | No brain region above the threshold |