Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 14;158(10):3629–3646. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1617

Table 1.

Bone Histomorphometry Analysis of Femoral Trabecular Bone

Static Vector Vehicle (n = 9) HMW Vehicle (n = 9) HMW NVP-BGJ398 (n = 5)
BV/TV, % 4.98 ± 0.72 2.95 ± 0.56a 3.25 ± 0.80
TbTh, μm 25.65 ± 1.67 24.19 ± 1.88 22.90 ± 1.54
ObS/BS, % 9.36 ± 1.73 9.96 ± 1.10 6.83 ± 1.13b
OcS/BS, % 11.94 ± 2.14 19.10 ± 2.51a 23.05 ± 3.76b
OcN/BS,1/mm 3.32 ± 0.55 5.04 ± 0.56a 5.38 ± 0.76b
TbN, 1/mm 1.91 ± 0.18 1.19 ± 0.19a 1.37 ± 0.26
TbSp, μm 534.5 ± 49.5 1062.4 ± 215.2a 815.6 ± 143.8b
Dynamic Vector Vehicle (n = 8) HMW Vehicle (n = 9) HMW NVP-BGJ398 (n = 8)
Interlabel thickness, u 7.54 ± 0.47 7.31 ± 0.46 8.88 ± 0.47c
Mineralizing surface/BS, % 21.64 ± 1.47 24.09 ± 1.25 25.80 ± 1.64
Mineral apposition rate, μm/d 1.51 ± 0.09 1.46 ± 0.09 1.78 ± 0.09c
Bone formation rate/BS, u3/u2/d 0.32 ± 0.02 0.35 ± 0.02 0.46 ± 0.04b,c

Abbreviations: ObS, osteoblast surface; OcN, osteoclast number; OcS, osteoclast surface; TbN, trabecular number; TbSp, trabecular separation; TbTh, trabecular thickness.

a

Vector-Vehicle vs HMW-Vehicle, P < 0.05.

b

Vector-Vehicle vs HMW-BGJ398, P < 0.05.

c

HMW-Vehicle vs HMW-BGJ398, P < 0.05.