Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Chem. 2017 Sep 22;38(30):2641–2663. doi: 10.1002/jcc.25052

Table 2.

Summary of de novo constructed molecules using focused libraries.

(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii)

Scoring Function Sampling Method Average #Builta Average #Uniqueb % Chem Identity Builtc % Pose Identity Builtd % Pose Identity Uniquee Time (sec)
SGE standardf 169.6 18.2 72.4 40.6 27.9 3,317
FPS standard 182.1 17.1 72.5 43.9 34.5 2,995
SGE + FMS standard 162.8 18.1 73.6 48.4 43.1 2,990
MGE + TAN standard 180.2 19.8 84.9 51.1 38.5 14,080
MGE + FPS standard 149.7 18.2 73.9 46.0 36.3 3,327
MGE + FPS enhancedg 636.7 38.7 83.3 57.3 46.8 20,637
a

Average number of molecules per receptor (from Built Ensembles).

b

Average number of molecules per receptor (from Unique Ensembles).

c

Percent Built Ensembles containing a molecule with TAN=1 to cognate ligand.

d

Percent Built Ensembles containing a molecule with TAN=1 and RMSD < 2.0 Å to cognate ligand.

e

Percent Unique Ensembles where best scoring molecule with TAN=1 has RMSD < 2.0 Å to cognate ligand.

f

25 molecules per layer of growth.

g

100 molecules per layer of growth.