Table 4.

Anthelmintic activity of selected extracts of plants collected from SBR, India.

Taxonomic name	Parts used	%, relative movement compared to the solvent
		Acetone	Water	Ethanol
A. salviifolium	Leaf	79 ± 9	119 ± 5	77 ± 10
A. scholaris	Leaf	–	–	73 ± 24
A. latifolia	Bark	–	–	25 ± 6
A. bunius	Bark	24 ± 3	81 ± 10	66 ± 6
A. octandra	Leaf	15 ± 5	62 ± 6	16 ± 17
B. acutangula	Leaf	–	–	47 ± 4
B. racemosa	Leaf	100 ± 16	73 ± 25	89 ± 10
B. lanzan	Bark	–	–	99 ± 2
B. monosperma	Flower	–	–	96 ± 8
C. arborea	Leaf	–	–	72 ± 8
C. arborea	Bark	72 ± 10	101 ± 16	77 ± 16
C. graveolens	Leaf	28 ± 3	79 ± 5	83 ± 11
C. patulus	Leaf	45 ± 1	86 ± 6	69 ± 16
C. oppositifolia	Leaf	55 ± 7	99 ± 8	83 ± 2
C. pallida	Fruit	37 ± 6	132 ± 11	101 ± 1
C. roxburghii	Leaf	–	–	86 ± 1
D. pentagyna	Leaf	–	–	110 ± 3
D. malbarica	Leaf	–	–	83 ± 8
E. rheedii	Seed	61 ± 6	112 ± 33	88 ± 4
G. velutinum	Leaf	72 ± 10	86 ± 4	116 ± 8
G. arborea	Leaf	39 ± 5	126 ± 20	34 ± 9
H. pubescens	Bark	–	–	35 ± 4
H. pubescens	Leaf	–	–	37 ± 10
H. gaitii	Leaf	30 ± 9	80 ± 5	56 ± 2
L. coromandelica	Bark	–	–	16 ± 8
M. peltata	Leaf	40 ± 5	92 ± 2	53 ± 4
M. malabathricum	Leaf	66 ± 15	66 ± 15	31 ± 12
M. extensa	Leaf	43 ± 4	88 ± 3	11 ± 13
M. rubicaulis	Leaf	66 ± 17	100 ± 2	72 ± 8
N. arbortristis	Leaf	35 ± 4	79 ± 11	36 ± 8
P. serratum	Fruit	37 ± 11	80 ± 19	28 ± 1
P. acerifolium	Bark	–	–	92 ± 2
P. acerifolium	Flower	–	–	55 ± 2
R. ellipticus	Leaf	69 ± 13	104 ± 3	49 ± 1
S. multiflora	Leaf	96 ± 8	110 ± 6	62 ± 4
S. multiflora	Bark	82 ± 11	82 ± 37	36 ± 3
S. cochinchinensis	Leaf	108 ± 6	35 ± 16	79 ± 16
V. maderaspatana	Leaf	41 ± 9	72 ± 25	28 ± 11
W. arborea	Leaf	49 ± 1	108 ± 16	36 ± 18
Levamisole		48 ± 3	53 ± 4	41 ± 10

(–) Data absent, all values are listed as mean ± SD; data were rounded to the nearest integer. Underlined values represent above 50 inhibition.