Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Aug 12;117(11):1792–1807. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.06.008

Table 3.

Direct weighing for food waste studies in the National School Lunch Programa

Reference
Jansen
and
colleagues, 197833
Davidson
and
colleagues, 197934
Comstock
and
colleagues, 198235
Getlinger
and
colleagues, 199636
Whatley
and
colleagues, 199637
Adams
and
colleagues, 200538
Toma
and
colleagues, 200939
Hoffman
and
colleagues, 201040
Lazor
and
colleagues, 201041
Chu
and
colleagues, 201142
Hoffman
and
colleagues, 201143
Cohen
and
colleagues, 201244
Yon
and
colleagues, 201245
Cohen
and
colleagues, 201346
Ramsay
and
colleagues, 201347
Byker and colleague, 20145 Cohen and colleaugues, 201448 Hunsberger
and
colleagues, 201449
Jones
and
colleagues, 201450
Jones
and
colleagues, 201451
Cohen
and
colleagues, 201552
Miller
and
colleagues, 201553
Wilkie
and
colleagues, 201554
Study design Qb CSc CS Ide If CS Ie If CS CS Lg CS MMh CS Q CS Ie MM Ie Ie RCTi Ie CS
Specific data collection method DWjk DW DWk DWk DWl DWm DWk DWk DWk DWk DWk DWk DWn DWk DWk DWk DWk DWk DWo DWo DWk DWk DWp
Type and no. of schools
 Elementary 29 23 11 1 2 4 1 4 12 4 9 1 1 4q 1 1q 1 7 1 1
 Middle 5 3 4 4 7
 High 29 2 2q
Grade level 5 and 10 1–3 1–5 or 6 1–3 3–5 1–5 Kindergarten-6 Kindergarten-1 NRr NR Kindergarten-1 NR 3–5 6–8 K Prekindergarten-Kindergarten 1–8 Kindergarten-2 Kindergarten-8 1–5 3–8 Kindergarten-5 Kindergarten-12
Average percent wasted for dietary components measureds
 Grains/bread 21 t 18 35
 Vegetables 51 16 73 51 67 73
 Fruits/fruit juice 30 12 47 33 43 36
 Meat/meat Alternate 18 18
 Milk 9 82 75 25 46 41
 Other 32u uv 2 v u v 18u 19u 51u 20u u 27u
Days of food waste data collectionw 10 NR 33 8 76 4 7 36 NR NR 60 8 9 8 4 5 16 5 23 64 84 3 20
No. of waste observationsx 130,000 230 13,749 NR 560 294 NR 1,414 1,933 NR 1,060 3,049 793 3,049 473 304 1,030 261 180 251 2,638 2,027 NR
Effective public health practice project quality rating10 Weak Weak Weak Moderate Moderate Weak Moderate Moderate Weak Weak Strong Moderate Weak Moderate Moderate Weak Strong Strong Moderate Moderate Strong Strong Weak
a

Data were collected to assess food waste after new school lunch meal patterns implemented beginning 2012.

b

Q=quasiexperimental.

c

CS=cross-sectional.

d

I=intervention.

e

Pre-post intervention.

f

Pre-post-follow-up intervention.

g

L=longitudnal.

h

MM=mixed methods.

i

RCT=randomized controlled trial.

j

DW=direct weighing.

k

Difference weight of plate waste for each food minus weight of average selected serving.

l

Percent plate waste calculated by dividing the weight of edible food waste by the mean serving weight.

m

Difference weight of plate waste for each food minus pre consumption selections for all students’ plates.

n

Weight of fluid milk remaining was determined using the full weight and empty container weight of the carton.

o

Fruit and vegetable consumption was calculated by weighing all produce prepared and subtracting unserved and waste weights, divided by number of students.

p

Waste was sorted by hand and weighed on a digital scale.

q

At least one study school was not identified as elementary or middle, but identified kindergarten through eighth grade or was not identified as middle or high, but identified as grades six through 12.

r

NR=not reported with specificity.

s

In some cases, the average percent waste within a dietary component was reported within the cited article. In other cases, this study’s authors calculated average percent wasted within a dietary component when research design collected waste across multiple intervention periods. When percent consumed was reported (instead of percentage waste), this study’s authors calculated average percent waste by subtracting the percent consumed from 100% and, if necessary, averaged across multiple intervention periods or groups.

t

◇=study indicated dietary component measured but not average percent wasted within dietary component.

u

Measured waste of a mixed entrée.

v

Specific macro- and/or micronutrients measured in whole meal.

w

Data calculated as number of days reported for study multiplied by number of schools involved in food waste collections.

x

Data reported according to study as individual food items or entire student tray.