Table 1.
Descriptive statistics for the 435 color images.
| Variable | Code | Mean | SD | Min. | Max. | Skewness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naming latency | RT | 1039 | 179 | 665 | 1660 | 0.53 |
| Name agreement (%) | NA% | 0.68 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 1.00 | −0.64 |
| H-value | H | 1.05 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 0.51 |
| Concept agreement | CA | 0.85 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 1.00 | −1.71 |
| Word length | W_len | 1.99 | 0.56 | 1.00 | 4.00 | 0.08 |
| Word frequency | W_fre | 2.40 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 4.47 | −0.02 |
| Age of acquisition | AOA | 3.76 | 0.83 | 2.13 | 6.13 | 0.28 |
| Familiarity | Fam | 3.86 | 0.59 | 2.00 | 4.82 | −0.49 |
| Object agreement | OA | 3.67 | 0.53 | 1.68 | 4.68 | −0.59 |
| Viewpoint agreement | VA | 3.46 | 0.59 | 2.03 | 4.71 | −0.02 |
| Visual complex | VC | 2.99 | 0.87 | 1.05 | 4.70 | −0.08 |
| Tip of tongue (%) | TOT | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.39 | 2.91 |
| Don't know name (%) | DKN | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 2.52 |
| Don't know object (%) | DKO | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 4.93 |
Naming latency was measured in milliseconds. Word length is given in number of characters. Word frequency is expressed in log-transformed values obtained from the SUBTLEX-CH database (Cai and Brysbaert, 2010).