Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 18;28(11):3345–3352. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017030228

Table 3.

Risk of heart failure associated with GSTM1 copy number (n=5368)

Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Model Genotypic Model (by GSTM1 Copy Number) Dominant Genetic Model
0 Copy 1 Copy 2 Copies P for Trend 0 or 1 Copy versus 2 Copies P Value LRT P Value
White cohort
 Model 1 1.14 (0.96 to 1.35) 1.17 (0.98 to 1.39) Reference 0.43 1.15 (0.97 to 1.36) 0.11 0.62
 Model 2 1.16 (0.97 to 1.38) 1.18 (0.99 to 1.42) Reference 0.31 1.17 (0.98 to 1.39) 0.07 0.69
Black cohort
 Model 1 1.05 (0.88 to 1.25) 1.15 (0.99 to 1.33) Reference 0.56 1.12 (0.97 to 1.28) 0.12 0.22
 Model 2 1.04 (0.87 to 1.23) 1.18 (1.02 to 1.36) Reference 0.63 1.13 (0.98 to 1.30) 0.09 0.25
Overall
 Model 1 1.09 (0.97 to 1.23) 1.15 (1.03 to 1.29) Reference 0.38 1.13 (1.01 to 1.25) 0.03 0.24
 Model 2 1.12 (0.99 to 1.26) 1.20 (1.07 to 1.34) Reference 0.32 1.16 (1.04 to 1.29) <0.01 0.13

Model 1: age, sex, center, and ten genetic principal components. Model 2: model 1 plus prevalent diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, smoking status, BMI, and eGFR. Race was included as a covariate in the combined analysis. Likelihood ratio test (LRT) was conducted to assess whether significant difference existed between the genotypic model and the dominant genetic model.