Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 15;14(5):5934–5946. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6954

Table VI.

Association between ErbB4 expression and clinicopathological parameters in IDC.

ErbB4 expression

Parameter Negative (−) n, % Weak-positive (1+) n, % Medium-positive (2+) n, % Strong-positive (3+) n, % P-value n
IDC 58
  Age, years 0.610
  ≤50 15 (38.5) 13 (33.3) 10 (25.6) 1 (2.6) 39
  >51 8 (42.1) 4 (21.1) 7 (36.8) 0 19
Lymph node metastases 0.001
  Negative 13 (52) 11 (44) 1 (4) 0 25
  Positive 10 (30.0) 6 (18.2) 16 (48.5) 1 (3) 33
IDC stage 0.266
  0-I 8 (53.3) 4 (26.7) 3 (20) 0 15
  II 12 (40) 8 (26.7) 9 (30) 1 (3.3) 30
  III–IV 3 (23) 5 (38.5) 5 (38.5) 0 13
IDC size 0.628
  ≤2 cm 8 (44.4) 6 (33.3) 4 (22.2) 0 18
  >2 cm 15 (37.5) 11 (27.5) 13 (32.5) 1 (2.5) 40
ER 0.457
  Negative 5 (27.8) 6 (33.3) 7 (38.9) 0 18
  Positive 18 (45) 11 (27.5) 10 (25) 1 (2.5) 40
PR 0.118
  Negative 4 (21.1) 8 (42.1) 7 (36.8) 0 19
  Positive 19 (48.7) 9 (23.1) 10 (25.6) 1 (2.6) 39

P-value was obtained from non-parametric rank sum test. IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.