Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2017 May 3;26(8):2152–2165. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0737-1

Table 5.

Means, Standard Deviations, and Multivariate Analysis of Covariance analysis for Observed Quality of Couple Interactions for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Comparison Group

ASD N = 173 Comparison N = 171 F value P Value η2p
Engagement (M, [SD]) 4.54 (1.01) 4.89 (0.94) 9.82 <.001 .03
Enjoyment (M, [SD]) 3.30 (1.36) 3.20 (1.36) 0.98 .325 .00
Mother Positive Affect (M, [SD]) 3.08 (1.50) 2.70 (1.30) 7.05 .006 .02
Father Positive Affect (M, [SD]) 2.83 (1.43) 2.42 (1.24) 8.16 .002 .03
Mother Negative Affect (M, [SD]) 2.44 (1.33) 2.25 (1.08) 0.53 .472 .00
Father Negative Affect (M, [SD]) 2.19 (1.19) 2.13 (0.98) 0.02 .883 .00
Irritation (M, [SD]) 2.42 (1.19) 2.26 (0.96) 0.77 .381 .00
Cooperation (M, [SD]) 4.45 (0.95) 4.75 (1.00) 5.24 .022 .02
Balance (M, [SD]) 4.88 (0.84) 5.11 (0.66) 4.71 .034 .01
Sensitivity (M, [SD]) 3.76 (1.07) 3.54 (1.06) 4.98 .031 .02
Conflict Resolution (M, [SD]) 4.17 (0.98) 4.32 (0.88) 1.12 .292 .00
Global Quality (M, [SD]) 4.51 (1.15) 4.44 (1.00) 0.68 .413 .00

Note. Covariates included parent race/ethnicity, parent education, relationship duration, family size, household income, and child age. η2p = partial eta squared. In follow-up analyses including overall couple relationship satisfaction as a covariate, group differences remained significant for Mother Positive Affect, Father Positive Affect, and Sensitivity. Finally, in a follow-up analysis, group differences in positive and negative affect were examined in a multilevel model using Hierarchical Linear Modeling software as these two dimensions were coded for each parent, within couples. The group effect remained significant for positive affect.