Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017 May;33(3):128–133. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000349

Table 1.

Summary of key pathways involving the gut-liver axis important for NASH

Receptor Type of deficiency Mechanism Model used Effect Ref
Pattern recognition receptors
TLR4 Global deficiency TLR4/MD2 mediated signals contribute to liver pathology via NADPH-dependent lipid-peroxidation and oxidative stress MCD diet Detrimental [26]
TLR5 TLR5 deficiency in hepatocytes Loss of hepatocyte TLR5 potentiates high-fat diet induced pro-inflammatory gene expression via Nod-like receptor C4 inflammasome MCD diet; HFD Protective [28]
TLR9 TLR9 deficiency in lysosome producing cells (neutrophils and KCs) Pro-inflammatory response via TLR9 activation HFD Detrimental [27]
Bile acid receptors
FXR Intestine specific deficiency Reduced triglyceride accumulation due to low ceramide synthesis genes[29]; Gut-restricted FXR activation reduces diet-induced weight gain, inflammation, hepatic glucose production and enhances thermogenesis and browning of white adipose tissue [30] HFD Controversial [29, 30]
TGR5 Global deficiency Antilipogenic effects of intestinal FXR agonist are TGR5 dependent HFD Part of the protective effect of the intestinal specific FXR agonist is reduced in TGR5 deficient mice [30]

HFD, high-fat diet; TLR, Toll-like Receptor; MCD, methionine and choline deficient diet; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; FXR, farnesoid X receptor: TGR, Takeda-G-protein coupled receptor 5; KC, Kupffer cell;