Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(24):2341–2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614835

Table 2.

Primary and Secondary Outcomes (Intention-to-Treat Population).

Outcome and Feeding Subgroup Buprenorphine (N = 33) Morphine (N = 30) Difference (95% CI)* P Value
days
No. of infants

 Bottle-feeding 21 21

 Breast-feeding 12 9

Primary outcome

Median duration of treatment (range) — days 15 (3 to 67) 28 (13 to 67) −13 (−21 to −7) <0.001

 Bottle-feeding 15 (3 to 67) 28 (13 to 67) −13 (−23 to −6)

 Breast-feeding 20 (3 to 55) 28 (16 to 52) −8 (−30 to 2)

Secondary outcomes

Median length of hospital stay (range) — days 21 (7 to 71) 33 (18 to 70) −12 (−22 to −7) <0.001

 Bottle-feeding 21 (7 to 71) 33 (18 to 70) −12 (−23 to −7)

 Breast-feeding 26 (7 to 58) 32 (20 to 58) −8 (−29 to 2)

Use of supplemental phenobarbital — no. (%) 5 (15) 7 (23) 0.36

 Bottle-feeding 2 (6) 4 (13)

 Breast-feeding 3 (9) 3 (10)
*

The difference between the buprenorphine group and the morphine group was calculated with the use of the Hodges–Lehmann estimator as the median of all paired differences between observations in the two groups with the corresponding nonparametric 95% confidence interval (CI).

This P value was calculated by means of the van Elteren test.

This P value was calculated by means of the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test.