Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar;14(2):69–75.

Table 1:

Composite resins used in the study according to the information provided by the manufacturers

Material (Manufacturer) Type Matrix Average particle size Filler type Filler loading vol% Filler loading wt% Shade Batch number
Aelite Aesthetic Enamel (BISCO, Schaumburg, USA) Nanohybrid composite Ethoxylated Bis-GMA, TEGDMA 0.5–2μm
0.05μm
Glass filler, amorphous silica 53 73 A2 1600004511
Aelite All Purpose Body (BISCO, Schaumburg, USA) Microhybrid composite Ethoxylated Bis-GMA, TEGDMA 0.04–0.7μm Glass filler, amorphous silica 55 76 A2 1600004474
Grandio (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) Nanohybrid composite Bis-GMA, dimethacrylate, UDMA, TEGDMA 1μm, 20–50nm Ba-Al-borosilicate glass filler, nanofiller (SiO2) 71.4 87 A2 1536078
Polofil supra (Voco, Cuxhaven, Germany) Microhybrid composite Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA 0.04–5μm Glass filler, silica 60 76.5 A2 1408140