Table 2.
Results of the LMEMs for predicting IMC.
| Sum (In+Anti) | In-phase | Anti-phase | Frequency change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Likability | F2,19.60 = 3.33∧ | F2,19.72 = 1.56 | F2,19.71 = 0.47 | F2,19.16 = 1.01 |
| Trial | F2,20.00 = 0.15 | F2,20.06 = 0.17 | F2,20.06 = 0.74 | F2,19.75 = 0.65 |
| Gaze (finger) | F1,79.48 = 0.43 | F1,79.48 = 0.43 | F1,101.33 = 1.02 | F1,130.81 = 4.52∗ |
| Gaze (body) | F1,71.54 = 1.40 | F1,71.54 = 1.40 | F1,89.37 = 0.75 | F1,85.42 = 0.09 |
| Likability:Trial | F4,83.24 = 3.96∗∗ | F4,83.13 = 2.74∗ | F4,83.14 = 0.96 | F4,83.65 = 0.75 |
| Likability:Gaze (finger) | F2,82.28 = 3.09∧ | F2,84.09 = 3.74∗ | F2,88.80 = 0.31 | F2,78.80 = 0.01 |
The dependent variables were the occurrence of in-phase, anti-phase and sum of both in- and anti-phase coordination in the 100% condition, and the frequency change rate in the 150% condition. Likability, Trial, Gaze (finger), Gaze (body), Likability:Trial, and Likability:Gaze were entered as fixed effects to see which factor was the significant predictor. ˆ0.05 < p < 0.1, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01.