Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 26;8:764. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00764

Table 2.

Summary of spontaneous firing properties of mPFC- and non-mPFC-responsive cells recorded in the LS.

Spontaneous activity: mPFC-responsive cells
Spontaneous activity: non-mPFC-responsive cells
FR (Hz) ISI (ms) CV of ISI FR (Hz) ISI (ms) CV of ISI
Control 4.10 ± 1.5 1635 ± 632.3 1.73 ± 0.3 12.72 ± 3.0 167 ± 33.9 1.31 ± 0.2
Vortioxetine 3.01 ± 1.3 1278 ± 328.8 1.45 ± 0.2 9.75 ± 3.1 290 ± 73.6 1.33 ± 0.1
Escitalopram 2.91 ± 1.5 2110 ± 719.3 1.12 ± 0.1 4.32 ± 0.7 350 ± 62.9 1.10 ± 0.1

No changes in firing rate, ISI and CV of ISI were observed in the LS with vortioxetine and escitalopram treatment. Data are presented as Mean ± SEM and analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc analysis (mPFC-responsive: n = 14 cells for control, n = 13 cells for vortioxetine-treated, and n = 11 cells for escitalopram-treated groups; non-mPFC-responsive: n = 19 cells for control, n = 15 cells for vortioxetine-treated, and n = 15 cells for escitalopram-treated groups).